Viewing sporting events on television is not exactly a hobby of mine, and I especially make sure to avoid the neofascist spectacle of team sports at all costs. Yet sometimes I do watch tennis, as it is a game I enjoy playing once in a while.
This weekend I found myself watching some of the Australian Open. While the play was consistently good, the tournament itself was a rude awakening, with emphasis on “rude.” Spectators in attendance were amazingly boorish, chanting and hooting throughout the games. And when did tennis fans begin indulging in juvenile antics such as face painting? This wasn’t a NFL game, after all. Fans attending the Sony Ericsson Open in Spain comported themselves with far greater dignity.

The players were more of a mixed bag. Many of the U.S. players are grating and obnoxious. There are the bitchy Williams Sisters
, who don’t dress quite as trampy on the courts anymore but still seem to thrive on arguing with judges. Then there is the perpetually frattish Andy Roddick, known for his snotty press conferences, condescension towards ball boys, and general jackassness. He also seems incapable of wearing shirts that fit, as they are always too loose, necessitating constant readjustment of his clothing.
Sometimes Roddick just plays without a shirt, as if he is auditioning for the homoerotic “Boys Gone Wild” videos or perhaps an Abercrombie & Fitch catalog. And I’m fairly certain I saw Roddick’s pal Mardy Fish spit on the courts. Lots of class there! At least James Blake carried himself with enough dignity and grace to overshadow somewhat the antics of his countrymen.
In a 2006 issue of The Weekly Standard, Jeffrey Hart wrote about how far tennis had come since the days when being a gentleman or lady mattered just as much as winning games. He starts with a telling anecdote:
During a junior tournament at the Los Angeles Tennis Club, Don Budge, then the best young player in northern California, won a match impressively. Expecting a compliment from Perry Jones, czar of West Coast tennis, he instead received a snarl: "Budge, those are the dirtiest tennis shoes I ever saw in my life. Don't you ever-don't you ever-show up again on any court anywhere at any time wearing shoes like that."
Budge had grown up poor in Oakland. He remembered that, and all that it meant, including respect for the game.
I don’t believe Jones would have approved of Andy Roddick’s shirtlessness, and really, no one should.
Hart’s piece ends on an optimistic note:
Though the gentleman Arthur Ashe won the men's U.S. Open in 1968, tennis was assaulted beginning in that same antinomian era by such talented vandals as John McEnroe and Jimmy Connors, whose manners were unacceptable, atrocious. But today the gentlemanly ideal is reasserting itself, notably in Roger Federer, who understands his place in tennis history, and so is aware of something much larger than any individual or any match. He shows this awareness in all aspects of his behavior: his tennis clothes, for example, and his flawless demeanor.
While Hart is right to praise Federer, watching the Australian Open makes me wonder if tennis now belongs to the barbarians.